Skip to content

What The Heck IS Canada’s Policy?

For public consumption, the Harper government in Ottawa says it is concerned about climate change. What the Canadian Government says about climate change:

While the challenges with respect to climate change are great, our responsibility is also clear. We are the stewards of our environment, and we will continue to count it amongst our most cherished and defining characteristics. The time has come for real action. The moment is now and the world must act.” Former Environment Minister Jim Prentice

However, the Harper government’s approach to climate change is piecemeal and ineffective at best, and obstructive and dangerous at worst. One of the lowest moments of the minority Harper government came when the House of Commons passed Bill C311, The Climate Accountability Act, that would have seen Canada act based on the science of climate change, and Harper used his majority in the unelected Senate to kill the bill (read more at: Canadian Senators Turn Their Backs On Democracy).

What the world says about Canada and climate change:

  • Fossil of the Year goes to CANADA, for bringing a totally unacceptable position into Copenhagen and refusing to strengthen it one bit.  Canada’s 2020 target is among the worst in the industrialized world, and leaked cabinet documents revealed that the government is contemplating a cap-and-trade plan so weak that it would put even that target out of reach.

Canada has made zero progress here on financing, offering nothing for the short term or the long term beyond vague platitudes…

Canada’s performance here in Copenhagen builds on two years of delay, obstruction, and total inaction.  This government thinks there’s a choice between environment and economy, and for them, tar sands beats climate every time. Canada’s emissions are headed nowhere but up.” Climate Action Network, (a group of 500 NGOs) at the end of the Copenhagen Conference, December, 2009

  • Karsten Sach, the head of the German delegation, stated at the Bali Climate Conference in 2007:  “We Europeans don’t see the Canadian position as constructive.”
  • To express their unhappiness with Canada’s position at recent climate talks in Thailand, the South African delegation stood up and led the Group of 77 developing nations – except for a group of small island states – out of the room when Canada addressed the conference.
  • In 2011, Canada was near the bottom of  the industrialized countries in the Climate Change Performance Index (54th out of 61, keeping company with Poland, China, and Saudi Arabia).

In December, 2011, Canada’s Environment Minister Peter Kent signaled that Harper Government’s  intention to withdraw from the Kyoto protocol, the only international agreement to address the problem of rising global carbon emissions and the result global warming. This makes Canada the only nation to pull out of the treaty, although the U.S. never ratified the treaty.

So  why the discrepancy between the lofty words on the Government of Canada website and the reality of the Canadian government’s policy?

Jim Hoggan, founder of PR firm James Hoggan and Associates and DeSmogBlog.com, explains it this way:

“The Canadian government’s climate plan is pure politics – pure public relations. It’s all hot air, with no regulation or legislation to back it up. The government is not passing laws to limit greenhouse gas emissions. It is not setting science-based targets and it’s not financing renewable energy.”

Our federal government has been saying that it is taking climate change seriously while its actions have been showing the exact opposite. Here are some recent examples:

In November, 2010, the unelected Conservative senators killed Bill C311, the Climate Accountability Act, which had been passed by the elected members of the House of Commons. In this unprecedented move, Stephen Harper and his party destroyed the only science-based climate legislation that Canada has. The result is that they have no response to the most pressing issue of our time, because to PM Harper apparently it isn’t important. Harper famously said, before the G20 meetings in June 2010, that the only important thing to focus on was the economy, and everything else was “just noise”.  Apparently Big Oil executives and the prime ministers who hang out with them don’t have to live on the same planet as the rest of us. Nor do their children and grandchildren.  For more information on the death of Bill C311, click here.

Unfortunately for Canadians, Harper and his minions aren’t just killing climate change legislation in Canada, they are also working hand in hand with Big Oil and the Alberta government to kill clean energy legislation outside our borders.  A report released by Climate Action Network Canada in November 2010, Tar Sands’ Long Shadow: Canada’s Campaign to Kill Climate Change Policy Outside Our Borders, documents at least three cases in which the Harper Government and the government  of Alberta colluded with the oil industry to weaken climate change policies. Click here for more info.

Staying true to form, in November, 2010 the Harper government also ended funding for the Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences, Canada’s only climate research organization.This confirms this government’s intransigence on moving towards clean energy and tackling this vital issue head-on. Instead, the Harper Government is stuck in the 20th century in its vision and understanding. The words ‘transition’  and ‘renewable energy” don’t seem to be part of the Conservative vocabulary.

Here’s Canadian author and activist Naomi Klein speaking about the current federal government’s push to brand Alberta tar sands oil as “ethical” as well as its increasingly well-deserved reputation as an oil industry cheerleader:

Let’s take a closer look at what the government claims and what it is actually doing:

This is what the Canadian government said was its positions and priorities at Copenhagen, according to a “Factsheet” from a Government of Canada website:

The science is clear: urgent action on climate change is required. The impacts of climate change are evident, particularly in the Arctic. At Copenhagen, Canada will work constructively to achieve a global consensus on a legally-binding international climate change agreement
that is fair, environmentally-effective and comprehensive.

The same fact sheets states that Canada’s approach to Copenhagen is based on 5 principles. Click on them to read more about the reality of the federal government’s actions:

#1:  Balancing environmental protection and economic prosperity.

#2 : Maintaining a long-term focus….contributing to the goal of a 50% reduction in global emissions by 2050.

#3:  Engaging and seeking commitments from all major economies.

#4:  Developing and deploying clean technologies.

#5:  Supporting constructive and ambitious global action.

The government paper goes on to say that “the shared vision” at Copenhagen should emphasize the importance of global action, and the importance of  “long-term cooperative action to achieve low-carbon growth and sustainable development.”  To be effective, the paper states, “all Parties, with the exception of the least developed, should undertake mitigation action…”  According to the government document:

Canada is committed to a mid-term, economy-wide reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of 20% from 2006 levels by 2020. Canada has also committed to undertake a full suite of policies and measures as part of a long-term, low-carbon sustainable growth pathway to reach emissions reductions of 60-70% from 2006 levels by 2050…

and here’s a very sticky point:

Developing countries, with the exception of the least-developed, should commit to nationally-appropriate mitigation actions that, at a minimum, lead to a substantial deviation from business-as-usual by around 2020,based on their mitigation potential and national circumstances.

The paper goes on to make further points about the need for enhanced action on adaptation as well as increased action on finance and investment.

This page will continue to be updated with more analysis of the reality of the Canadian government’s action (or inaction) on  this crucial issue.  Stay tuned!

More links and resources:

Harper Government Receives Diplomatic Spanking Over Climate Policies

Canadian Senators Turn Their Backs On Democracy and Kill Bill C311, The Climate Accountability Act

4 Comments leave one →
  1. Judi Sim permalink
    June 19, 2010 11:42 am

    I can’t find a site that allows me to join a Canadian Petition to halt off-shore drilling in Canada. Can you enlighten me? If there isn’t one, how come?

  2. Christine permalink*
    June 19, 2010 12:47 pm

    Good question Judi. My guess as to why the focus of petitions to get the US to halt offshore drilling is because that’s where the disaster is happening right now, plus a lot of Canadian activist attention is focused on the ongoing disaster of the Alberta tar sands. But you’re absolutely right, the same kind of oil catastrophe could be happening off the East coast of Canada, or in the Arctic. It seems that the drilling that is being considered in the Arctic is significantly deeper than the well that is spewing oil in the Gulf.

    I did find some info – WWF and Sierra Club Canada have been working to shed light on this issue, especially after the recent BP disaster which happened to be when the NEB was holding hearings on offshore drilling in Ottawa. Sierra Club Canada (SCC) is calling for a moratorium on offshore drilling. WWF Canada is calling for an expansion in the National Energy Board (NEB) regulatory review regarding off shore drilling – here are some info and links:

    http://www.manitobawildlands.org/news_item.asp?number=1461
    http://www.sierraclub.ca/en/publications/brief-history-oil-spills-and-our-uncertain-future

    As for petitions, the only one I could find was this one by the Dogwood Initiative based on the West Coast which targets a pipeline designated to carry oil from the tar sands through their province:
    http://dogwoodinitiative.org/notankers/

    If you are on Facebook, there is a “Ban Offshore Drilling in Canada” group (http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/group.php?gid=117244764965637 ) . On that group I found Canada-specific info about the “Hands Across the Sands” protest that is being organized as a result of the Gulf disaster:
    http://handsacrossthesand.com/organize.php?country=Canada

    And here’s some news you may not want to hear, about the spills that have already happened in our pristine arctic:
    http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/100530/national/arctic_spills

    Hope this helps!

  3. Jeff permalink
    December 3, 2010 1:05 am

    The Canadian government will do nothing, because to take strong action would entail pissing off Alberta. We love the revenues the Tar Sands bring in – hey, it’s PROSPERITY! I find it ironic that the only economic interest that matters are those of big oil. Assume, for just a minute, that climate change is real, and that inaction will result in significant levles of CO2, with disastrous consequences. No serious scientist not on thepayroll of Exxon or Suncor would argue otherwise. So, who pays the consequences in the future? Farmers around the world who will have to contend with droughts and floods. Any industry that depends on fisheries or forest products. Individual consumers who will have to pay to cool houses in the summer becuase of abnormally high temperatures, and heat their homes during unprecedented cold spells. How about ski hill operators, vacation lodges, even people with homes on the water that will be engulfed by higher water levels and more virulent storms? Unfortunately, the Tories have proven that Canada is no better, and perhaps even worse than the “pay to play” polictics of the US. Take action sheeple. No number of $80K year jobs in the tar sands are worth this. And frankly, no one has the right to affect any other peoples economic well being because it just happens to be really, really good for their own. I’m disgusted for the first time to be a Canadian.

  4. Christine permalink*
    December 3, 2010 5:32 pm

    I have to agree with everything you said, Jeff. We are saddled with a government that seems to think the economy trumps everything, as if there’s a viable economy without a viable planet.

    I do hope you turn your strong feelings into action – join with other people who feel the same way as you do. There are oasis of hope all across our wonderful country – people who are working in the Transition Town movement, for example, or Citizens Climate Lobby groups which are starting up. It may feel overwhelming, but at the end of the day it feels a whole lot better to look the next generation in the eye (whether they’re your children, your nieces and nephews, or the kid down the street) and say that you/we did everything we could to make their world a safe and secure place for them to raise their own children.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s